
n*e*r*d, "
seeing sounds"
cancelled last night's plans (my date had issues), so i ended up staying home, which is always perfect for me, but i feel so guilty that colleagues were expecting me to turn up. note to self: you're not that important!
and here's my 2 cents worth re the "bill henson controversy". i don't think bill henson's work is meant to titillate, and i don't think that he intends to sexualise the naked form more than they naturally are. additionally, i think it's important that artists deal with sexuality, even if (or should i say, especially if) they're sometimes off-putting and challenging because not many others would.
of course, the pictures have effects beyond henson's studio, but artists can never be held responsible for what they do not intend. imagery have their own lives beyond artistic intention. if "the little mermaid" makes 3 men in the universe want to go out and do unspeakable things to piranha, surely disney shouldn't have to pay?